Clothes make the (wo) man
sent to the raccoon from Wis at the Avalon
Artists Wis and son Jim are busy constructing Guitartown II, their second effort, to be ready in June.
....................
.............................
All-American restaurant
is a gallery of flags
front to back
called Dady (sic) Oh's
where we went for lunch today.
We like the decor and the food.
Picture shot from our back booth
....................
From Sunday Review section, NY Times 4-7-13
............................................
Some readers will remember this paean to Wern Farms Game Farm
that first appeared in LANDMARK quarterly
the publication of the Waukesha Historical Society:
http://raccoonnews.blogspot.com/2011/10/hunting-season-again.html
Columnist Frank Bruni had an article in the same section of the Times
last Sunday on the subject of shooting birds on game farms.
See the following:
Here is the above text in more readable font:
Frank Bruni
Day of the Hunter
People who rhapsodize about the glory of hunting never
mention what an unfair fight it is.
Or was, in my case. I
went last week, for the first time, visiting a bird hunting grounds in Pennsylvania with two
companions. The pheasants and partridges
there had wings, which gave them one advantage over us. Over them we had
something like 50 advantages: the number
of shells for our shotguns. The gun on
loan to me, a semiautomatic, could fire three rounds in rapid succession, which
seemed to me as many as anybody could want or need before reloading. I’m a lousy aim, and I still killed.
I had never used a firearm before, not even on a shooting
range, and understood the allure instantly.
My 12-gauge semi was black, sleek elegant, and Italian-made, as much an
accessory as an instrument of death. The
Vinci, it’s named, as in Leonardo da, the “Rennaisance inventor, artist and
thinker who shattered the technological boundaries of his world,” according to
the website of the manufacturer, Benelli.
This is how thoroughly a weapon can be romanticized and fetishized, as
if it were a Rolex, as if it were a shoe.
Holding it, I felt potent.
But also anxious, even panicked, with a new grasp of how much could go
wrong. The safety on the Vinci is a
small, gray button, and the difference between on and off is perhaps a
quarter-inch. In a moment’s distraction,
I could mistake one for the other. In a
burst of adrenaline, I could deactivate the safety too soon before a shot or
wait too long after to reactivate it.
I could forget, when not aiming at a bird, to keep the gun
pointed toward the sky or the ground. Or my pivot when I followed a bird’s
flight could bring one of my companions, so perilously near me, into my
sights. I was haunted by this and by the
fact that although I was a first-timer, I needed no background check, no
training, no proof of any dexterity to hold this shotgun and squeeze its
trigger, not on the kind of regulated hunting grounds (called a preserve) that
we went to. This country of ours makes
it astonishingly easy for people to arm themselves and take aim. Is it any
wonder that we have an exceptional harvest of gun-related injuries and deaths,
many accidental?
I went hunting mainly for dinner. A few weeks ago I was in a
favorite Manhattan
restaurant, Tertulia, and its chef, Seamus
Mullen, mentioned that he had been shooting and cooking game birds. I
said that I had never eaten anything I’d killed myself, and had never
acknowledged, in that way, the connection between an animal’s death and my
nourishment and pleasure. We agreed that
I should join him in his next expedition.
An experience of hunting made ethical sense.
An experience of hunting made ethical sense.
Political sense, too. Hunting is always coming up when the
country is debating new restrictions on firearms, as we are now. Opponents of
such basic gun-control measures as universal background checks and an assault
weapons ban talk of slippery slopes and raise the specter of parents’ being
unable to lend shotguns to their children for a wholesome duck or deer hunt.
They assert the importance to hunters of certain semiautomatics that might be
prohibited.
Hunting enthusiasts recently went as far as advocating a
boycott of Colorado
because the state had passed some entirely reasonable new gun restrictions. There’s
this assiduously orchestrated outcry that a primal, virile, broadly beloved
American pastime is under dire siege from disconnected lawmakers.
And it’s hooey. Let’s take the broadly beloved part first. The
popularity of hunting has generally declined over the past four decades.
According to a survey by the Fish and Wildlife Service, only 13.7 million
Americans 16 or older hunted in 2011, the most recent year for which figures
are available. That’s in a country of more than 313 million people.
In Pennsylvania ,
the number of people interested enough
in hunting to get licenses
dropped from 1.2 million in the 1980s to about 930,000 now, according to
Joe Neville, a spokesman for the game commission. And fewer than half of those people are such
committed hunters that they renew their licenses regularly.
Hunters are already governed by a thicket of state and local
regulations about whether they can use a rifle or a shotun in a certain place,
for a certain quarry; about how many
bullets or shells it can hold; about
when they can hunt; about how much, or
even what gender, of a creature they can kill.
Any tinkering that new federal measures would do is so puny in contrast
as to be almost irrelevant. It’s not going to threaten hunting as we know it.
And hunting as it’s done doesn’t always hew to the
man-in-nature images often promoted.
Paul Ryan with his bow and arrow is one kind of hunter; a klutz like me with my Vinci loafer – I mean
shotgun – is another.
The pheasants and chukar partidges, or chukars that I was
after had been scattered across a stretch of property so that Seamus, a friend
of his and I could chase them down.
That’s how preserves work. The
birds are raised there, and some are released from their pens just before the
hunt.
Advantage No. 52:
many of the birds weren’t so quick to use their wings. We would be
within inches of one of them before it fluttered skyward, and it would be maybe
20 feet away when one of us took our shot, which wasn’t a single bullet bur
rather – Advantage No. 53 – a scattering of pellets.
If we missed a bird, it tended to land close enough to be
flushed out anew. Only three birds
actually fled the area and escaped death.
All of that explains how even I managed to down a chukar.
Maybe a pheasant as well: it was
sometimes hard to tell whose shot had hit what.
And there was a thrill to it, no question. My heart hammered. My curiosity spiked. Will a dinner of these birds – gutted,
cleaned and cooked by Seamus, thankfully – be different from another? On my blog next week, I’ll let you know.
I’d hunt again, though I’m in no rush. It was impossible for
me not to be nervous around guns, even with Seamus patiently teaching me and
repeatedly urging vigilance.
He’s 38 and has hunted on and off since his teens. I asked him if more stringent gun control
would cramp his and other hunters’ style.
“A totally bogus argument,” he said without hesitation or
elaboration, then he flitted to a topic that accommodated more disagreement. How should the pheasant be prepared?
.....................
THE HISTORIC ANNUAL 1ST CONGREGATIONAL UCC CHURCH
PANCAKE SUPPER
was held Tuesday, April 9, 2013 in the church basement.
As reported before
it was a fine affair.
We walked through the torrential rain and wind from the Odd Fellows hall to take up our work as a pourer of coffee
at 3:30, a half-hour ahead of the start time. Our perambulating stroll the three blocks to the landmark church had us grasping with two hands the 'bed canopy' golf umbrella to keep it from turning itself inside out in the heavy wind.
People in cars at Barstow and South stared. A smile lurked beneath the strugglous expression we wore.
We made it. And the umbrella is back in service as our bed canopy.
We made it. And the umbrella is back in service as our bed canopy.
(A parenthetic digression; a repeat:)
What we did:
Strung a clothesline
to hold big umbrella
above head of bed
shielding eyes from glare of skylight high above;
put one end of rope over top rung
of free-standing stepladder (no nails);
counter-weighted that end of clothesline
with an old hand sledge hammer
to allow narrow angle of ladder-lean
to prevent ladder tipping over into the room;
tied other end onto a C-clamp screwed onto
a shelf board resting on loft stair landing ledge
(again no nails);
the resting shelf is secured only on the
right end, with one small but firm screw hole neatly drilled.
^.^
Some photos of this year's pancake festival:
Traditionalists Sid Estenik and Jack Mathie,
members of long note, handle ticket sales at the
top of the stairs. Bathed in stained glass, they are ready
for the onslaught of local pancake connoisseurs.
Bruce Boeck holds the key job of mastering the batter mix.
This is a sensitive task, for which Bruce is well-qualified.
Behind him lurk the grill flippers, beginning a long evening of single-tasking.
Interesting, colorful local fellow, Bill Huelsman,
who many years ago came to the Congregational church
at the invite of his then land-lady, Beulah Brockway,
enjoys freeing his mind at the old and faithful griddle.
He controls the size of the pancakes by triggering the
batter hopper kept full by mixer Bruce. And he adjusts the flame
beneath the turning griddle.
The evening of pancakes begins as the hall fills up.
At this table early Congo-ite George Love finds a seat
with grand-daughter Olivia and others not identified or shown.
Two Waukesha girls attending improvise a patti-cake game.
Congo member William serves seconds on the pancakes.....
~
In this manner, another annual Cong. pancake supper is accomplished.
Through random shutter-clicks we show only some of the ingredients
that go into the successful rendering.
The circle of The Congregational Mens' Club - from creation of pancakes to the serving of same -
including the planners, car parkers and ticket salesmen, comprises a disparate but convivial assortment, people of various ages and side-proclivities, who together get the job done. They are backed by a cloud of historic witnesses, some in the ether, and real.
The Mens Club is helped by industrious women who prepare bakery for the upstairs
bake sale, and who assist is serving the pancakes, sausages,
apple-sauce and ice cream. It is a joint effort.
Part of the secret of this local church lasting 175 years is revealed in this anecdotal report.
ALL ARE WELCOME!.
